Starbucks Basically Called the “Loser” Claim on Charlie Kirk’s Favorite Drink Fake

"After a full investigation, we found no evidence to support this."

By

Published Sept. 23 2025, 10:39 a.m. ET

A woman by the name of Jacqueline Garretson took to X (formerly Twitter) on Sept. 16, just days after the Charlie Kirk shooting at Utah Valley University, claiming someone wrote “LOSER” on her mother-in-law’s Starbucks cup.

The drink ordered was a Mint Majesty tea with two honeys, the same order Charlie reportedly had daily to honor him.

Article continues below advertisement

With people across the nation now ordering the tea in Kirk’s honor, many even requesting the name “Charlie” on their cups, Jacqueline believed the act was targeted.

For context, the drink was ordered from a Starbucks in Chicago. She pressed the store’s general manager for answers and demanded an investigation, and a clip of the exchange went viral after being shared by @mikedropnews.

Starbucks has since responded, and their findings may surprise you.

Starbucks basically said the word “LOSER” written on the cup was fake, citing a lack of evidence.

After Jacqueline’s allegations went viral on social media, claiming that a Starbucks team member at their Chicago location wrote “LOSER :)” on a cup after they ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite drink, a Mint Majesty with two honeys, Starbucks responded via X.

Article continues below advertisement

For context, here’s Jacqueline's initial claim she shared to X: "This morning, a family member went to Starbucks and ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite drink — Mint Majesty with honey. When their cup came back, it was marked with the word 'loser :)' scribbled across it."

Article continues below advertisement

Two days later, on Sept. 18, Starbucks replied: "After a full investigation, we found no evidence to support this. We do not believe this comment was written by a Starbucks Partner."

Prior to the response, Jacqueline had visited the Starbucks with a man presumed to be her husband, demanding that the manager conduct a thorough investigation and hold the person responsible.

However, Starbucks’s investigation reportedly found no evidence that anyone had written the message. The following day, Jacqueline commented on Starbucks’s response, writing, "Hello, please feel free to send me the video footage you have on file. You have my contact info."

Article continues below advertisement

While Starbucks hasn’t responded to that request, if she wanted to obtain footage of the baristas from the day the drink was purchased, she’d likely need to file a civil claim and get court approval.

Meanwhile, at other Starbucks locations, baristas are steering clear of the Charlie Kirk drink order drama. Here’s what they're doing.

Article continues below advertisement

Starbucks baristas are trying to say out the Charlie Kirk drink drama.

With more claims surfacing about Starbucks baristas allegedly writing snarky comments on Mint Majesty teas with two honeys, drinks clearly being ordered to honor Charlie Kirk, and customers requesting the name “Charlie Kirk” on their cups, many baristas are choosing to stay out of the drama.

Article continues below advertisement

Like the barista at a Yucaipa location who was recorded telling a customer she couldn’t write “Charlie Kirk” on a cup due to its political nature. Staying neutral seems like a fair choice, as it helps prevent rude comments (if they’re happening) and keeps workers out of political disputes.

But not everyone agreed. The customer in question walked out mid-order after the barista refused to put “Charlie Kirk” on the cup.

Advertisement
More from Distractify

Latest Politics News and Updates

    © Copyright 2025 Engrost, Inc. Distractify is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.